Historical data

How much do we really know about corporate bond returns before the modern data era? Until recently, the answer was: not enough. Most empirical work in corporate bond pricing has relied on relatively short samples, especially the post-2002 TRACE period, leaving open the question of whether observed risk premia are robust over longer horizons. Ghaderi, Plante, Roussanov, and Seo (2026) Ghaderi, Plante, Roussanov, and Seo (2026) address this limitation by constructing a historical database of U.S. corporate bond returns from 1895 to 2022. Using hand-collected monthly bond quotes from sources such as the Commercial and Financial Chronicle, Standard & Poor’s Bond Guide, and Mergent/Moody’s Bond Record, they assemble a large panel of corporate bonds that allows for a much longer view of credit risk, return predictability, and factor pricing in fixed income.

For U.S. equities, fixed income, and commodities, reconstructing long-term historical datasets is relatively straightforward, and we have already explored these challenges in several previous studies, including 100 Years of Multi-Asset Trend Following, Extending Historical Daily Bond Data to 100 Years, and Extending Historical Daily Commodities Data to 100 Years. Moreover, the broader methodology of reconstructing missing market histories shares many similarities with the techniques discussed in How to Replicate Any Portfolio. Emerging markets, however, represent a particularly interesting opportunity for historical reconstruction, as reliable long-term data is often unavailable for much of the 20th century despite the growing importance of these markets in modern portfolio construction and asset allocation. In this article, we present the framework we developed to extend emerging market histories in a consistent and economically meaningful way, enabling more robust long-term quantitative research and modelling.