For those who have not yet had the chance to read it, we recommend the latest empirical study by Minghui Chen, Matthias X. Hanauer, and Tobias Kalsbach, which shows that design choices in machine learning models, such as feature selection and hyperparameter tuning, are crucial to improving portfolio performance. Non-standard errors in machine learning predictions can lead to substantial portfolio return variations, and authors are highlighting the importance of robust model evaluation techniques.

Active Share is a popular metric used to gauge how actively managed a portfolio is compared to its benchmark, but its predictive power for fund performance is questionable. Our research suggests that high Active Share often reflects exposure to systematic equity factors rather than genuine stock-picking skill. Additionally, inaccuracies in benchmark selection can distort the metric’s insights, making it unreliable as a standalone measure. A more effective approach is to conduct a factor analysis of alpha to better understand a manager’s performance and true sources of over/underperformance.

The rise of passive investing has been one of the most profound trends in the asset management industry in the past two decades. However, how does the popularity of passive funds impact market risk? We can rely on the data, and a recent research paper shows that the impact is significant, mainly through a substantial increase in stock correlations. As more investors flock to passive funds, which track indices, the prices of stocks within those indices tend to move more in tandem, increasing market-wide risk.

Do the quants possess a crystal ball? The recent research hints, that if we try to process the Twiter images, then we may get a small glimpse into the future. The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meetings significantly influence financial markets, drawing global attention from traders and investors, especially regarding equity risk premia. Recent research indicates that combining sentiment analysis of Twitter images with text analysis can more accurately predict stock performance on FOMC days than text alone.

Studies using machine learning techniques for return forecasting have shown considerable promise. However, as in empirical asset pricing, researchers face numerous decisions around sampling methods and model estimation. This raises an important question: how do these methodological choices impact the performance of ML-driven trading strategies? Recent research by Vaibhav, Vedprakash, and Varun demonstrates that even small decisions can significantly affect overall performance. It appears that in machine learning, the old adage also holds true: the devil is in the details.

Short sellers often have a bad reputation, seen as market disruptors who profit from declining prices. Yet, they play a crucial role in making markets more efficient by identifying overvalued assets and correcting mispricings. A recent study uncovers another surprising aspect of their behavior: rather than just demanding liquidity, the most informed short sellers actually provide it. Using transaction-level data, the research shows that these traders supply liquidity, especially on news days and when trading on known anomalies, challenging the conventional view of short sellers as merely aggressive market participants.