Seasonality is a well-known phenomenon in the commodity markets, with certain sectors exhibiting predictable patterns of performance during specific times of the year. These patterns often attract investors who aim to capitalize on anticipated price movements, creating a self-reinforcing cycle. But what if you could stay one step ahead of the crowd? By front-running these seasonal trends—buying sectors with expected positive performance (or shorting those with negative seasonality) before their favorable months begin—you can potentially gain a significant edge over traditional seasonality-based strategies. In this blog post, we explore how to construct and backtest a systematic strategy using commodity sector ETFs to exploit this seasonal front-running effect.

Short sellers often have a bad reputation, seen as market disruptors who profit from declining prices. Yet, they play a crucial role in making markets more efficient by identifying overvalued assets and correcting mispricings. A recent study uncovers another surprising aspect of their behavior: rather than just demanding liquidity, the most informed short sellers actually provide it. Using transaction-level data, the research shows that these traders supply liquidity, especially on news days and when trading on known anomalies, challenging the conventional view of short sellers as merely aggressive market participants.

In this article, we explore the historical performance of sector momentum strategies and examine how their alpha has diminished over time. By analyzing the underlying causes behind this decline, we identify key factors contributing to the underperformance. Most importantly, we introduce an enhanced approach to sector momentum, demonstrating how this solution significantly improves the performance of an ETF sector momentum strategy, making it once again an effective tool for systematic investors.

Does the investment in sophisticated machine learning algorithm research and development pay off? It is an important question, especially in light of the increasing costs related to the R&D of such algorithms and the possibility of decreasing returns for some methods developed in the more distant past. A recent paper by Azevedo, Hoegner, and Velikov (2023) evaluates the expected returns of machine learning-based trading strategies by considering transaction costs, post-publication decay, and the current high liquidity environment. The obstacles are not low, but research suggests that despite high turnover rates, some machine learning strategies continue to yield positive net returns.

The area we want to explore today is an interesting intersection between quantitative and more technical approaches to trading that employ intuition and experience in strictly data-driven decision-making (completely omitting any fundamental analysis!). Can just years of screen time and trading experience improve the metrics and profitability of trading systems through discretionary trading actions and decisions?

One of the main reasons why the Pragmatic Asset Allocation Model was designed is to give investors a tax-efficient possibility to invest in a global equity portfolio with a lower risk than the passive buy&hold approach. Therefore, the PAA model is not the “absolute return” model but rather the tactical model that prefers to invest in the equity risk premium and move to the hedging portfolio (gold, treasuries, or cash), only for short periods and only when it’s absolutely necessary. We use price trend+momentum indicators and yield curve inversion as signals for such situations when (based on the past data) there is a higher probability of recessions and equity bear markets. What is unusual in the current situation is the length of time that the YC is inverted (19 months at the moment), which makes it the 2nd longest YC inversion in the last 100 years, and we are analyzing the implications for the PAA model.