Factor allocation

Cryptocurrencies have matured from experimental curiosities into a viable investable asset class whose return-generation and risk characteristics merit treatment within empirical asset pricing. A recent paper by Nicola Borri, Yukun Liu, Aleh Tsyvinski, Xi Wu summarizes ten facts from the literature that show cryptocurrencies share important similarities with traditional markets—comparable risk-adjusted performance and a small set of cross-sectional factors—while retaining distinctive features such as frequent large jumps and price signals embedded in blockchain data. Key themes include portfolio diversification, factor structure, market microstructure, and the evolving role of regulation and derivatives in shaping market discovery and stability.

The clustering of excess returns on the final trading days of the month constitutes a robust empirical regularity with significant implications for portfolio construction. We document a month-end premium that is both statistically and economically significant, distinct from the canonical turn-of-the-month (ToM) effect. Our strategy highlights systematic style rotations—particularly shifts in value versus growth exposures, as proxied by the IVE–IVW spread—and documents parallel contemporaneous dislocations between real-estate and broad-equity benchmarks, as measured by the IYR–SPY spread.

The U.S. equity market has periodically been dominated by a few technology-driven stocks, most recently the so-called “Magnificent Seven.” Historically, similar dominance occurred during the Nifty Fifty era in the 1960s–1970s and the dot-com boom in the 1990s. These periods of concentrated leadership often led to temporary outperformance, but systematically capturing such gains has proven challenging. Our study investigates the potential to exploit technology sector dominance using momentum-based strategies across Fama–French 12 industry portfolios, analyzing whether long-only, long-short, and rolling-basis approaches can generate persistent alpha, and assessing the limitations of simple timing methods.

The low-risk anomaly in financial markets has puzzled researchers and investors, challenging the traditional risk-return paradigm (higher risk->higher return). This phenomenon, where low-risk assets outperform their high-risk counterparts on a risk-adjusted basis, has been observed across various asset classes, including stocks and mutual funds. What may be the possible explanation? Pass-through mutual funds, which aim to replicate the performance of specific market indices, play a crucial role in this context by channeling investor flows and potentially influencing asset prices through demand pressure.

When using machine learning to forecast global equity returns, it’s tempting to focus on the raw prediction—whether some stock market is expected to go up or down. But our research shows that the real value lies elsewhere. What matters most isn’t the level or direction of the machine learning model’s forecast but how much it differs from a simple, price-based benchmark—such as a naive moving average signal. When that gap is wide, it often reveals hidden mispricings. In other words, it’s not about whether the ML model predicts positive or negative returns but whether its view disagrees sharply with what a basic trend-following model would suggest. Those moments of disagreement offer the most compelling opportunities for tactical country allocation.

Over the past decade and a half, the US equities have set the hard-to-beat performance benchmark. Nearly all of the other countries, no matter if small or big, emerging or developed, have lagged behind. However, what are the forces behind this outperformance? Why did most of the other markets and even investing styles bow to the US large-cap growth dominance? A new paper written by David Blitz nicely analyses the rise of the behemoth.