Over the past few years, significant shifts in the financial landscape have reshaped the dynamics of global markets, including the cryptocurrency sector. Events such as the ongoing war in Ukraine, rising inflation rates, the soft landing scenario in the US economy, and the recent Bitcoin halving have all profoundly impacted market sentiment and price movements. Given these developments, we decided to revisit and reassess trading strategies, specifically Trend-following and Mean-reversion in Bitcoin published in 2022, which utilized data from November 2015 to February 2022. This new study explores how these strategies would have performed from November 2015 to August 2024, taking recent changes into account. The study also examines market changes between February 2022 and August 2024, highlighting developments since previous research. Additionally, it evaluates the influence of seasonality on Bitcoin’s price action, similar to our previous article – The Seasonality of Bitcoin. By analyzing these factors, we aim to provide deeper insights into the evolving behavior of the world’s leading cryptocurrency and guide investors through the complexities of today’s market environment.

Throughout history, geopolitical stress and tension has been ever-present. From ancient civilizations to today’s world, global dynamics have been largely shaped by wars, terrorism, and trade disputes. Financial markets, as always, have keenly observed and been significantly influenced as a result.

Our article delves into understanding this relation between geopolitical stress and financial markets, particularly the equity market. To briefly explain our approach, we seek to quantify geopolitical stress through an observable Geopolitical Stress Index (GSI). Using this index, we can explore the relation between geopolitical sentiment, good and bad, and instruments available on financial market. Lastly, we seek to see if geopolitical sentiment is something that can be used to impact trading decisions and develop profitable trading strategies.

High-yield bond ETFs represent a unique financial vehicle: they are highly liquid instruments that hold inherently illiquid securities, creating a fertile ground for predictable market behaviors. Our latest research uncovers an intriguing anomaly within these ETFs, similar to those observed in the stock market: overnight returns are systematically higher than intraday returns. This overnight anomaly in high-yield bonds is not only prevalent but also exhibits a distinct seasonal pattern, primarily from Monday’s close to Tuesday’s open and from Tuesday’s close to Wednesday’s open. Additionally, this anomaly displays a reversal characteristic, where overnight performance is typically more robust following a negative close-to-close performance in the preceding period. These findings reveal potential opportunities for trading strategies that leverage these consistent overnight return patterns, offering new insights into high-yield bond trading dynamics.

In the complex world of financial markets, subtle patterns often reveal themselves through careful observation and analysis. Among these is the intriguing phenomenon we can call the “Lunch Effect,” a pattern observed in U.S. stock indexes where market performance tends to exhibit a distinct positive shift immediately after the lunch break, following a typically negative or flat performance earlier in the trading day right before the lunch. This lunchtime revival is not an isolated occurrence; it shares a curious connection with the “Overnight Effect,” a well-documented tendency for the U.S. stock market to experience the bulk of its appreciation during non-trading hours, with relatively little movement during the trading day itself. Together, these effects underscore the intricate dynamics of market behavior, where timing and investor psychology play crucial roles in shaping intraday and overnight market performance. Understanding these patterns can offer valuable insights into the rhythm of the markets and the underlying factors that drive short-term price movements.

Professor Robert Shiller’s CAPE (cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings) ratio is well-known among the investment community. His methodology for assessing a valuation of the U.S. equity market is undoubtedly the most cited and discussed. Therefore, it’s not surprising that there exists quite a lot of papers that try to refine and expand the CAPE’s methodology. One such last attempt is the work of James White and Victor Haghani, whose research paper revolves around the use of a modified version of the Cyclically-Adjusted Price Earnings (CAPE) ratio, termed P-CAPE. Their methodology aims to improve the estimation of long-term expected real returns of the stock market by incorporating the dividend payout ratio into the traditional CAPE metric.

The area we want to explore today is an interesting intersection between quantitative and more technical approaches to trading that employ intuition and experience in strictly data-driven decision-making (completely omitting any fundamental analysis!). Can just years of screen time and trading experience improve the metrics and profitability of trading systems through discretionary trading actions and decisions?