Arbitrage

Leveraged ETFs provide amplified exposure to an underlying index, but their daily reset mechanism creates volatility drag, which can substantially reduce their long-term value. This raises the possibility of exploiting the effect by simultaneously shorting leveraged ETFs with opposite exposures. We examine a 50/50 short portfolio of TQQQ and SQQQ, which provides approximately neutral exposure to the Nasdaq-100 while seeking to capture volatility decay. We analyze the strategy explicitly incorporate borrowing costs. We further investigate daily and weekly rebalancing, execution timing, and tranche-based rebalancing over five-, ten-, and twenty-day horizons. The results show that borrowing costs materially reduce the apparent profitability of the strategy. Moreover, after costs, returns are concentrated in a small number of high-volatility periods, while the strategy is largely neutral during ordinary market conditions. The findings demonstrate that ignoring short-selling costs and implementation details can substantially overstate the attractiveness and robustness of volatility-decay strategies.

Alternative ETFs sit at an unusual intersection of public-market accessibility and hedge-fund-style investment techniques. They package managed futures, merger arbitrage, and option-based income strategies into exchange-traded products, yet they remain thinly traded and relatively niche compared to mainstream equity or bond ETFs. This combination makes them intriguing: they offer exposure to alternative risk premia, and their limited liquidity raises possibilities to build short-term reversal strategies. 

Prediction markets are financial platforms where participants trade contracts linked to future events, with prices reflecting collective probabilities. While these markets efficiently aggregate information, systematic inefficiencies create trading opportunities. Notable strategies include inter- and intra-market arbitrage, exploiting price differences across platforms or mispricing within a single market. Behavioral biases, such as the longshot bias, lead traders to overvalue underdogs and undervalue favorites, while bookmakers may manipulate odds to mislead naive participants. Experienced traders can exploit these patterns to secure profits. This article reviews common systematic edges in prediction markets, illustrates their practical application, and highlights the potential for profitable trading.

Cryptocurrencies have matured from experimental curiosities into a viable investable asset class whose return-generation and risk characteristics merit treatment within empirical asset pricing. A recent paper by Nicola Borri, Yukun Liu, Aleh Tsyvinski, Xi Wu summarizes ten facts from the literature that show cryptocurrencies share important similarities with traditional markets—comparable risk-adjusted performance and a small set of cross-sectional factors—while retaining distinctive features such as frequent large jumps and price signals embedded in blockchain data. Key themes include portfolio diversification, factor structure, market microstructure, and the evolving role of regulation and derivatives in shaping market discovery and stability.

Uninformed long-term investors provide an easy target for short-term traders, and they often unscrupulously take advantage of them. But ETF investors with long investment time horizons can mitigate some of the front-running costs if they take transactional costs into account to calculate whether it is economically optimal to participate in these “market games” (exchange and broker fees + classical opportunity costs of actively participating in strategy execution). Today, we will turn our attention to the paper “ETF Rebalancing, Hedge Fund Trades, and Capital Market” from Wang, Yao, and Yelekenova to better understand complex relationship between ETFs (their investors) and hedge funds.

In a game of poker, it is usually said that when you do not know who the patsy is, you’re the patsy. The world of finance is not different. It is good to know who your counterparties are and which investors/traders drive the return of anomalies you focus on. We discussed that a few months ago in a short blog article called “Which Investors Drive Factor Returns?“. Different sets of investors and their approaches drive different anomalies, and we have one more paper that helps uncover the motivation of investors and traders for trading and their impact on anomaly returns.