Momentum

A single backtest can show that strategy was profitable, but it does not always show whether the strategy was competitive. This is especially true for systematic futures strategies. A trend-following strategy can have a positive Sharpe ratio, a long live-like performance history, and a reasonable drawdown, but those numbers are difficult to interpret without a relevant comparison group.
A broad equity index is often not the right benchmark for this type of strategy. A monthly rebalanced multi-asset futures strategy has a different objective, different risk profile, and different return drivers than a long-only stock index. A more useful question is whether the strategy performs well compared with other systematic trend-following futures strategies.
This case study shows how the Quantpedia API can be used to build a custom peer group benchmark for strategy evaluation. The workflow has two steps. First, Quantpedia strategy metadata is used to screen and define a comparable peer group. Second, the historical equity curves of the selected strategies are downloaded, converted into daily returns, and aggregated into an equal-weighted peer group benchmark.

We document a persistent intramonth momentum cycle in U.S. sector ETFs that yields meaningful risk-adjusted returns when properly sequenced. Using the nine original Select Sector SPDR ETFs and SPY as the market benchmark from December 1998 through June 2026, we show that trailing 252-day sector momentum generates a positive spread on the first trading day of the month—and then sharply reverses on days two and three. A third, independent leg of the cycle emerges in the window from ten to five trading days before month-end, consistent with the intramonth momentum cycle recently documented at the single-stock level by Nathan, Suominen and Tasa (2026). Stitching the three legs together into a single composite strategy delivers 5.99% annualized return at a 0.55 Sharpe ratio for the long-short variant, and 3.77% at 0.54 for the market-neutral variant—all while being invested fewer than half the trading days each month. Our contribution is twofold: we extend the calendar-anomaly literature from individual equities to sector-level portfolios, and we provide practitioners with a transparent, low-turnover framework that translates these academic patterns into actionable trade schedules.

Trend following was one of the most persistent anomalies in finance for nearly two centuries, yet its performance deteriorated sharply after the 2008 financial crisis. An analysis of approximately 100 liquid futures contracts from 1995 to 2025 shows that this decline is highly selective. The decisive factor is not asset class, liquidity, market electronification, or strategy crowding, but volatility-normalized tick size. After 2008, trend-following profits collapsed almost entirely on small-tick contracts across all signal horizons, while remaining largely intact on large-tick contracts. This finding suggests that modern trend-following portfolios are fundamentally split into two distinct regimes governed by market microstructure rather than traditional asset classifications.

This paper tests whether that rotation in attention leaves a systematic footprint. Using Donchian breakout signals across QQQ and Bitcoin, with cash as a fallback during periods of consolidation, we examine whether investors can harvest momentum without remaining permanently exposed to either asset’s full drawdown profile. The results suggest that the answer is yes: retail attention does not move randomly. It rotates, it concentrates, and—when measured through price breakouts—it can be systematically exploited.

This study investigates short-term price reversals—temporary retracements following adverse daily returns—and develops a systematic trading framework to capture this effect across multiple asset classes. Using daily data from six liquid ETFs spanning equities, fixed income, currencies, gold, and commodities over the period 2006–2025, the strategy applies a long-term trend filter based on a 200-day moving average combined with a multi-day pullback trigger. Trades are executed dynamically with volatility-adjusted position sizing and equal-weighted allocation across active signals. Parameter sweeps, sensitivity analyses, and sub-period tests are conducted to evaluate the robustness of the approach, including variations in moving average length, number of consecutive down days, holding periods, and alternative momentum indicators such as short-term RSI. The study also explores the practical integration of AI tools— ChatGPT and Claude—to assist in research, analysis, and visualization, assessing their effectiveness in generating coherent quantitative insights.

Commodities represent a vital but highly volatile asset class, characterized by pronounced cyclicality, lack of yield, and susceptibility to severe macroeconomic drawdowns. While cross-sectional (relative) momentum is a well-documented anomaly, its application in commodities often forces portfolios to hold the “least declining” assets during broad-based bear markets, resulting in unacceptable tail-risk. This study empirically evaluates the efficacy of a Dual Momentum framework—combining relative strength ranking with an absolute time-series trend filter—applied to a diversified suite of commodity sector ETFs (DBA, DBB, DBE, DBP) from 2007 to 2026. We demonstrate that while pure relative momentum exhibits high parameter sensitivity and inconsistent benchmark outperformance, the inclusion of an absolute momentum filter structurally mitigates drawdowns and universally outperforms a static, equally weighted benchmark across all tested parameter combinations. The findings suggest that Dual Momentum provides a robust, parameter-agnostic framework for portfolio managers seeking tactical commodity exposure with superior risk-adjusted return profiles.