## Fractal mathematics used to explain #14 - Momentum Effect in stocks Wednesday, 22 July, 2015

**#14 - Momentum Effect in Stocks**

Authors: **Berghorn, Otto**

Title: **Mandelbrot Market-Model and Momentum**

Link: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2620112

Abstract:

Mandelbrot has significantly contributed in many ways to the area of finance. He was one of the first who criticized the oversimplifications centered around the early stochastic process models of Bachelier utilizing normal distribution. In his view, markets were fractal and much wilder than classical theory suggests. Additionally, he was a profound critic of the efficient markets hypothesis. Particularly, his work of fractional Brownian motion showed that the independence claim made by that hypothesis is not valid; in addition, he proposed a multi-fractal asset model to reconcile for effects observed in the market. However, it is also known that his vision of fractal markets used fractal trends. Recently, we were able to show that the scaling behaviour of trends, as defined by a specific trend decomposition using wavelets, are the root cause for the momentum effect. Additionally, we were able to show that these trends have fractal characteristics. In this work, we will revisit Mandelbrot’s vision of fractal markets. We will show that the momentum effect discussed heavily in literature can be modeled by the so-called Mandelbrot Market-Model. Additionally, this model shows, from the risk side, that markets are wilder because of trend structures compared with classical models. In conclusion, we derive what Mandelbrot always knew: There are no efficient markets.

Notable quotations from the academic research paper:

...

"Recently, in Berghorn (2015, Trend Momentum, Quantitative Finance, Volume 15, Issue 2, 261-284), we were able to show that the momentum effect is caused by trends in asset price data. Trends, are not mathematically defined in general and the term „trend“ is often used ambiguously. In Berghorn (2015, Trend Momentum, Quantitative Finance, Volume 15, Issue 2, 261-284) we used a special wavelet trend decomposition scheme to model price data into up- and downward trends. Particularly, we were able to show that, in accordance with Mandelbrot’s scaling analysis, so defined trends in price data are scaled with respect to the granularity level of analysis of that particular wavelet decomposition scheme.

Furthermore, the average trend sizes, as computed by the decomposition scheme, are following a power law. When we compared the power law exponents (measuring the average trend sizes) of random processes and the real world data, we were able to show that real world data structurally exhibits higher exponents. By mathematical experiments, we showed that the higher (so-called momentum) exponent (in real world data) is causing the momentum effect. Because the momentum strategy did not exhibit higher risks and had a significant higher return, we concluded that there are no efficient markets because the independence of asset returns is non-existent, and momentum strategies provide simple mechanisms to generate excess returns.

In the following, we will revisit some key components of Berghorn (2015, Trend Momentum, Quantitative Finance, Volume 15, Issue 2, 261-284). We use these to establish additional Monte Carlo simulations. Particularly, we test certain random process models by comparing the outcome of a classic momentum strategy with what we have observed with real world data. We will show, in particular, that non-stationary random walks (with piecewise varying drifts and volatilities) do not model momentum well. We will then use trend bootstrapping based on a recursive trend decomposition introduced in Berghorn (2015, Trend Momentum, Quantitative Finance, Volume 15, Issue 2, 261-284) and show that this type models the momentum effect quite well. We will analyse the trend statistics of that decomposition and will model price data as being constructed by a superimposition of trends. Under this model (and after taking the logarithm of the prices), the slopes and the sizes of the trends are drawn from a lognormal distribution. This is a natural extension of continuous returns and allows us to derive an analytical form for this type of process. We compare this construction and verify that it (although technically different) fulfils Mandelbrot’s vision of fractal markets. This so-called Mandelbrot Market-Model describes the mathematical characteristics enabling the momentum effect. Additionally, we show that market data under this model is wilder than what is usually assumed. Particularly, the shortfall risks of a buy-and-hold investment are significantly higher when we use this model compared to classical approaches. In that regard, we conclude that this model is better suited than classical approaches in literature, such as random walk or fractional brownian motion. Consequently, and in accordance with Mandelbrot’s analysis, markets are wilder and exhibit trending (modelled by that model) and, therefore, cannot be efficient."

**Are you looking for more strategies to read about? Check http://quantpedia.com/Screener**

**Do you want to see performance of trading systems we described? Check** **http://quantpedia.com/Chart/Performance**

**Do you want to know more about us? Check** **http://quantpedia.com/Home/About**

## Recent posts

- Two Versions of CAPM
- Equity Factor Strategies In Frontier Markets
- 50 Years in PEAD (Post Earnings Announcement Drift) Research
- The Best of Strategies for the Times of Crisis
- Using Deep Neural Networks to Enhance Time Series Momentum
- Time-Series Momentum Works Everywhere
- Equity Momentum in Years 1820-1930
- Video + Online Presentation for Bear Market Strategy
- Skewness / Lottery Effect in Commodities
- Transaction Costs of Factor Strategies