Alternative data

In an era of increasingly fragmented market microstructure, the emergence of cross-asset connectedness between Crypto and public equity markets presents a critical challenge for modern portfolio construction. This blog post examines the recent working paper by Harin de Silva, “The Attention Factor: The Speculative Risk You May Already Own,” which identifies a previously underappreciated transmission channel: a speculative cohort of marginal investors whose sentiment shifts propagate correlated price movements across BTC, zero-day-to-expiration (0DTE) options, commission-free brokerages, and social-sentiment-driven equities. The author introduces the Attention factor—a capital-backed measure of collective conviction—as a systematic risk driver that persists after controlling for traditional macro factors, fundamentally reshaping how we model Equity Risk in multi-asset portfolios. For quantitative practitioners, this work underscores the need to augment conventional Risk Models with sentiment-aware factors to capture residual connectedness that standard factor frameworks may overlook.

Carbon that has not yet been emitted should not be used to predict stock returns. While this sounds obvious, prior research papers have done exactly that. This critical observation forms the basis for the Robeco Institutional Asset Management research team’s re-examination of the relationship between climate risk and asset pricing. Investors and academics alike have sought to understand how environmental factors influence stock returns, often assuming that higher emitters command a risk premium. However, the timing of data availability is crucial in quantitative strategy formation, and misalignments here can lead to spurious conclusions about the pricing of carbon emissions.

Investors are increasingly exploring alternative indicators to gain an edge in financial markets. Traditional signals, such as earnings reports or macroeconomic data, often come with delays or may already be priced in. As a result, unconventional metrics have attracted attention. In this article, we examine the Producer Price Index (PPI) for the Corrugated and Solid Fiber Box Manufacturing industry, including corrugated boxes and pallets. Our motivation is to evaluate this index’s effectiveness as a predictive signal for the S&P 500 ETF, sector-specific ETFs, and individual stocks such as Amazon (AMZN), one of the largest consumers of materials tracked by this index. We present several investment strategies that incorporate this indicator and assess whether it can enhance risk-adjusted returns.

Corporate conferences have long been recognized as pivotal events in financial markets, serving as catalysts that signal upcoming innovations and strategic shifts. Scheduled corporate events induce market reactions that can be systematically analyzed to reveal predictable return patterns. In this work, we focus on examining the return drift exhibited by technology stocks in the days surrounding their respective conferences, employing simple quantitative methods with daily price data.

The hypothesized return drift is premised on the notion that investor sentiment and market dynamics are significantly altered by the information disseminated at these conferences. Investors, reacting to both anticipatory signals and post-announcement adjustments, tend to drive prices in a measurable manner in the windows immediately preceding, during, and after the events. By systematically analyzing stocks of companies such as Apple, Google, and Microsoft, this study aims to validate the existence of these drift patterns and shed light on the underlying mechanisms, thereby enhancing mutual understanding of event-driven asset pricing dynamics.

When using machine learning to forecast global equity returns, it’s tempting to focus on the raw prediction—whether some stock market is expected to go up or down. But our research shows that the real value lies elsewhere. What matters most isn’t the level or direction of the machine learning model’s forecast but how much it differs from a simple, price-based benchmark—such as a naive moving average signal. When that gap is wide, it often reveals hidden mispricings. In other words, it’s not about whether the ML model predicts positive or negative returns but whether its view disagrees sharply with what a basic trend-following model would suggest. Those moments of disagreement offer the most compelling opportunities for tactical country allocation.

Navigating the financial markets requires a keen understanding of risk sentiment, and one often-overlooked dataset that provides valuable insights is FINRA’s margin debt statistics. Reported monthly, these figures track the total debit balances in customers’ securities margin accounts—a key proxy for speculative activity in the market. Since margin accounts are heavily used for leveraged trades, shifts in margin debt levels can signal changes in overall risk appetite. Our research explores how this dataset can be leveraged as a market timing tool for US stock indexes, enhancing traditional trend-following strategies that rely solely on price action. Given the current uncertainty surrounding Trump’s presidency, margin debt data could serve as a warning system, helping investors distinguish between market corrections and deeper bear markets.