New related paper to #33 – Post-Earnings Announcement Effect

"In this paper, we suggest another possibility that causes PEAD rather than market friction; that is, investment horizon of shareholders. Different investors have different investment horizons. For example, some investors like retirees require stable cash flows from their investment for a long time, while other investors like young generation seek relatively high profits in a short-term. We call the former type long-term investors and the latter type short-term investors.  We suppose that long-term investors are inattentive to short-term events such as earnings announcements and slowly respond to the events. On the other hand, short-term investors are likely to pay much attention to short-term events and actively trade stocks to exploit potential profits from the events. Therefore, our hypothesis is that PEAD occurs only among stocks mostly traded by long-term investors."

"Based on the above studies, we adopt the Sturn measure by Kwon and Kim (2014), as a proxy for investment horizon of each stock’s shareholders. Specifically, we use U.S. mutual fund data and calculate share-weighted portfolio turnover levels of mutual fund shareholders for each stock. High Sturn measure implies that shareholders of the stock have short-term investment horizon. We also estimate a standardized unexpected earnings (SUE) measure using analyst forecast data. Stocks are divided into three groups based on Sturn, and PEAD is estimated for each Sturn group. As a result, PEAD is strong (1.55% with t-value 7.08) for the low-Sturn group, while it is weak (0.48 with t-value 1.44) for the high-Sturn group. The difference is -1.09% with t-value 3.39, which is economically significant as well as statistically significant since its annualized value is about 14%. We conclude that PEAD is strong for stocks mostly held by long-term investors."

"Interestingly, the results contradict the prediction of the previous studies that PEAD should concentrated on stocks with high transaction costs and low investor recognition. Stocks in the low-Sturn group have smaller transaction costs and higher investor recognition than stocks in the high-Sturn group; however, PEAD is stronger for stocks in the low-Sturn group. It strongly supports the idea that PEAD is caused by underreaction of long-term investors. Cross-sectional regression results reconfirm that investment horizon of shareholders remains a strong determinant of PEAD even after transaction costs and investor recognition are controlled for."

Share onRefer to a friend
Subscription Form

Subscribe for Newsletter

 Be first to know, when we publish new content
logo
The Encyclopedia of Quantitative Trading Strategies

Log in

MORE INFO
We boasts a total prize pool of $15,000
Gain a Share of a Total Prize Pool of $25.000
MORE INFO
$15.000
Gain a Share of a Total Prize Pool
SUBSCRIBE TO NEWSLETTER AND GET:
- bi-weekly research insights -
- tips on new trading strategies -
- notifications about offers & promos -
Subscribe
QuantPedia
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.