Volatility premium

Recent market action has once again underscored how rapidly volatility can surface across asset classes, as evidenced by pronounced price swings in gold, silver, and cryptocurrency markets. Such episodes routinely revive debate within the quantitative community about structural drivers of intraday instability, with particular attention paid to the growing prominence of S&P 500 zero-days-to-expiration (0DTE) options. The rapid proliferation of these ultra-short-dated contracts has fueled concerns among practitioners, regulators, and exchange operators that concentrated option activity may transmit destabilizing hedging flows into the cash equity market. At the same time, the paper under review challenges this prevailing spillover hypothesis, suggesting that the availability of 0DTE options systematically alters market-makers’ hedging exposures in a way that may dampen, rather than amplify, realized index volatility. So, do 0DTE options truly increase market volatility?

Extreme market events, once perceived as statistical outliers, have become a central concern for investors. The persistence of sharp drawdowns and volatility spikes demonstrates that the cost of ignoring tail risks is not tolerable for long-term portfolio resilience. While diversification can mitigate ordinary fluctuations, it often fails when markets move in unison under stress. This makes explicit protection against severe downside events not just desirable but necessary. Tail hedging addresses this need by providing a structured defense against the most damaging scenarios, ensuring that portfolios remain robust when traditional risk management tools fall short. Using VIXY ETF, we will present and test a range of hedging strategies designed to protect portfolios under stress. By applying robust testing frameworks, we aim to evaluate how different implementations of VIXY ETF-based tail hedges perform across a variety of market environments, highlighting both their strengths and inherent trade-offs.

In one of our older posts titled ‘Case Study: Quantpedia’s Composite Seasonal / Calendar Strategy,’ we offer insights into seasonal trading strategies such as the Turn of the Month, FOMC Meeting Effect, and Option-Expiration Week Effect. These strategies, freely available in our database, are not only examined one by one, but are also combined and explored as a cohesive composite strategy. In partnership with Deltaray, using MesoSim — an options strategy simulator known for its unique flexibility and performance — we decided to explore and quantify how our Seasonal Strategy performs when applied to options trading. Our motivation is to investigate whether this strategy can be improved in terms of risk and return. We aim to systematically harvest the VRP (volatility risk premium) timing the entries using calendar strategy to avoid historically negative trading days.

What does one of the most popular and well-known metrics, VIX, tell us about future returns? Academic research (Bansal and Stivers, July 2023) shows that a common, intuitive 20/80 thumb rule can be applied as time-variation in the returns earned from equity-market exposure can be explained well by a simple 2-term risk-return specification, which predicts (1) much higher returns 20% of the time following after VIX exceeds a high threshold at around its 80th percentile and (2) lower excess returns following a high market sentiment. They argue that VIX and market sentiment tend to measure complementary aspects of risk: the level of risk (VIX) and the price of risk or risk appetite (sentiment), and that, thus, both terms should be accounted for when evaluating time variation in the equity market’s risk premium.

The expected return on the “variance factor” known as variance risk premium (VRP) is nothing new to options markets. For any investor interested in benefitting from this phenomenon, we present the study of Dörries et al. (2021), which provides a clear overview of different VRP-earning strategies.

Over the last few years, we may have noticed a significant growth in retail investing. No surprise, the COVID pandemic outbreak increased the numbers even more, and undoubtedly, options trading is no exception. According to the authors (de Silva, Smith, Co), retail traders seek options expecting spikes in volatility and, for that reason, incline toward firms with more media coverage. Furthermore, their trading increases around the time of firms’ earnings announcements. As a result, market makers benefit from the behavior mentioned above, which causes a large flow of money from retail to market makers.