Own-research

Many beginners enter the markets with the same silent assumption: if they study hard enough, find the right indicators, or discover the right strategy, they should eventually be able to generate high returns with manageable risk. The market appears full of examples that seem to confirm this belief. Screenshots of triple digit gains are everywhere. Backtests often look smooth. Social media makes it feel as if exceptional performance is common.

That perspective matters because most of the mistakes beginners make do not stem from a lack of ability or effort. They arise from starting with the wrong mental model and unrealistic expectations about how markets actually work.

The global investment environment is going through a period of meaningful structural change. The dominance of the U.S. dollar is increasingly being questioned, geopolitical tensions are rising, and macroeconomic uncertainty remains elevated. Together, these forces challenge the post-Global Financial Crisis environment in which U.S. equities consistently outperformed most international markets. As a result, investors may be approaching a turning point where relative returns between U.S. equities and international markets—especially Emerging Markets (EM)—begin to shift.

Rather than relying on static asset allocation approaches, we develop a dynamic allocation model that uses momentum and trend signals to generate practical timing signals between U.S. and EM equities. Emerging Markets are particularly interesting in this context because they tend to experience stronger regime shifts and larger performance cycles than developed international markets.

One year ago, in our article “Can We Finally Use ChatGPT as a Quantitative Analyst?”, we explored the feasibility of leveraging ChatGPT for quantitative analysis. Since then, a lot has changed: newer models are now available (from OpenAI and also other vendors), and the ecosystem around AI-assisted analysis has evolved significantly. Back then, we encountered numerous challenges, ranging from model hallucinations and faulty code generation to excessive overfitting. In this article, we revisit these issues to assess what has improved and what remains unresolved, with the goal of finally answering whether we can use LLMs to assist with quantitative analysis tasks.

Quantitative strategy research is rarely about discovering a single “perfect” trading rule. In practice, robust portfolios emerge from a structured research process that filters ideas, evaluates evidence, and combines complementary strategies.

To make the process concrete, we use value-based equity strategies as our working example. However, the goal of the article is not to identify the ultimate value strategy, but to illustrate how a systematic research workflow can be used to build a diversified portfolio of strategies around any investment hypothesis.

The goal of our article is to examine the long-term relationship between small value and large growth stocks using more than 100 years of data and test whether the spread between small value and large growth portfolios shows trends that could help investors switch between the two styles. Using the Fama and French 2×3 and 5×5 size and book-to-market portfolios, we construct the small value minus large growth (SV–LG) spread and apply simple trend-following signals based on moving averages and momentum with horizons ranging from 3 to 12 months. Our results show that trend-following strategies are able to capture part of the value outperformance on the long side. Timing periods when growth stocks dominate is much more difficult.

This study examines the effectiveness of several anomaly-based trading strategies applied to the real estate sector represented by the RlEst index from the Fama–French 48 industry portfolios. Using monthly data from July 1, 1926, to December 1, 2025, we analyze whether selected strategies are capable of generating superior risk-adjusted returns compared to both the standalone RlEst index and the broader market represented by the Fama–French 12-industry portfolios. The tested approaches include trend-following strategies based on moving averages, momentum strategies based on the rate of change of the index, and seasonality-based strategies utilizing different look-back periods.