Inflation significantly impacts the prices of gold and treasury bonds through various mechanisms. Gold is often viewed as a hedge against inflation, while treasury bonds exhibit a more complex relationship influenced by interest rates and investor behavior. This relationship between inflation, gold, and treasuries is well understood, but the real question is whether we can systematically capitalize on it. In this article, we explore how inflation data can be used to build trading strategies—and as our findings suggest, the answer is a definite yes.

For decades, investors and analysts have relied on traditional industry classifications like GICS, NAICS, or SIC to group companies into sectors and peer groups. However, these rigid categorizations often fail to capture the evolving nature of businesses, especially in an era of technological convergence and rapid industry shifts. Machine learning (ML) offers a more dynamic and data-driven alternative by analyzing company visuals—such as logos, product images, and branding elements—to identify similarities that go beyond predefined classifications. A recent study applies this approach to construct new industry groupings and tests them in industry momentum and reversal. The results show that ML-generated groups lead to superior performance, once again highlighting the potential of image-based classification in financial analysis.

Can we truly rely on the opening price in OHLC data for backtesting? While the overnight drift effect is well-documented in equities, we investigated its presence in gold using the GLD ETF and then extended our analysis to the GDX – Gold Miners ETF, where we observed an unusually strong overnight return exceeding 30% annualized. However, when we tested execution at 9:31 AM using 1-minute data, the anomaly diminished significantly, suggesting that the extreme return was partially a data artifact. This finding highlights the risks of blindly trusting OHLC open prices and underscores the need for higher-frequency data to validate execution assumptions.

Hello all,

– An updated Seasonality Analysis report
– 10% discount code for those who help us and fill out our survey
– an invitation to Quantpedia Awards 2025 competition with a $25.000 prize pool
– 9 new Quantpedia Premium strategies have been added to our database
– 8 new related research papers have been included in existing Premium strategies during the last month
– Additionally, we have produced 8 new backtests written in QuantConnect code
– 5 new blog posts that you may find interesting have been published on our Quantpedia blog in the previous month

Last year, we promised our readers that the Quantpedia Awards would be back! And now it’s again time to unveil what we have prepared for you.

For a quick recapitulation (for those who were not around in 2024, when we started this activity for the first time), our Quantpedia Awards 2025 aims to be the premier competition for all quantitative trading researchers. If you have an idea in your head about systematic/quantitative trading or investment strategy, and you would like to gain visibility on the professional scene, then submit your research paper, and you can compete for an attractive list of prizes. All info about the prizes, submission process, expert committee, and our partners are described in detail on our dedicated subpage: Quantpedia Awards 2025. However, we will also give you a quick overview in this blog post.

Building upon the established research on market seasonality and the potential for front-running to boost associated profits, this article investigates the application of seasonal strategies within the context of crisis hedge portfolios. Unlike traditional asset allocation strategies that may falter during market stress, crisis hedge portfolios are designed to provide downside protection. We examine whether incorporating seasonal timing into these portfolios can enhance their performance and return-to-risk ratios, potentially offering superior risk-adjusted returns compared to static or non-seasonal approaches.