Many beginners enter the markets with the same silent assumption: if they study hard enough, find the right indicators, or discover the right strategy, they should eventually be able to generate high returns with manageable risk. The market appears full of examples that seem to confirm this belief. Screenshots of triple digit gains are everywhere. Backtests often look smooth. Social media makes it feel as if exceptional performance is common.

That perspective matters because most of the mistakes beginners make do not stem from a lack of ability or effort. They arise from starting with the wrong mental model and unrealistic expectations about how markets actually work.

Hello all,

What have we accomplished in the last month?

– Launch of Quantpedia’s API
– Invitation to Uncorrelated Puerto Rico conference
– Quantpedia Awards 2026 reminder
– 11 new Quantpedia Premium strategies
– 7 new related research papers
– 7 new backtests
– and finally, 7 new posts on our Quantpedia blog

The global investment environment is going through a period of meaningful structural change. The dominance of the U.S. dollar is increasingly being questioned, geopolitical tensions are rising, and macroeconomic uncertainty remains elevated. Together, these forces challenge the post-Global Financial Crisis environment in which U.S. equities consistently outperformed most international markets. As a result, investors may be approaching a turning point where relative returns between U.S. equities and international markets—especially Emerging Markets (EM)—begin to shift.

Rather than relying on static asset allocation approaches, we develop a dynamic allocation model that uses momentum and trend signals to generate practical timing signals between U.S. and EM equities. Emerging Markets are particularly interesting in this context because they tend to experience stronger regime shifts and larger performance cycles than developed international markets.

One year ago, in our article “Can We Finally Use ChatGPT as a Quantitative Analyst?”, we explored the feasibility of leveraging ChatGPT for quantitative analysis. Since then, a lot has changed: newer models are now available (from OpenAI and also other vendors), and the ecosystem around AI-assisted analysis has evolved significantly. Back then, we encountered numerous challenges, ranging from model hallucinations and faulty code generation to excessive overfitting. In this article, we revisit these issues to assess what has improved and what remains unresolved, with the goal of finally answering whether we can use LLMs to assist with quantitative analysis tasks.

Can crypto still help diversify an equity portfolio—or has that edge disappeared? That’s the practical question behind Crypto Contagion. The paper looks at how shocks move between crypto and U.S. equities, and more importantly, how that relationship changed after the launch of crypto ETFs. Instead of relying on simple correlations, the authors use a combination of jump detection (to isolate real stress events) and machine learning techniques to identify actual spillovers. By comparing periods before and after ETFs, they effectively show how the market structure—and with it, the behavior of crypto—has shifted .

Carbon that has not yet been emitted should not be used to predict stock returns. While this sounds obvious, prior research papers have done exactly that. This critical observation forms the basis for the Robeco Institutional Asset Management research team’s re-examination of the relationship between climate risk and asset pricing. Investors and academics alike have sought to understand how environmental factors influence stock returns, often assuming that higher emitters command a risk premium. However, the timing of data availability is crucial in quantitative strategy formation, and misalignments here can lead to spurious conclusions about the pricing of carbon emissions.